IDENTIAL.
C
$232
Ren 29 FEB 161
205
House
th, 21st. January, 1916.
ir.
989:
Heferring to my Confidanti al Despatch of tho
nệ, July and to your talegrum of the 29th, fotober, I have the bumur ta sinte that I men mutisfied, on further consideration, that
It is not neceusury to have recourse to legislation in or for to bevont the improper user of enemy-owɔd trade marks,
With regard to the assumption in your tele{:ram that the works in question are the subject of a joint vonture I bild point out that, with the swaption of two marks in the pint names of Messrs, Arnhold Korburg å tv. uni beours, Geariga maor Sen afce, and a few marks in the names of Hesuro, Meyerink || despe's. Junlop, all the marks registorad by energy firms, in- duding those used upon gooda imported from smufacturers in the ited Kingen, are registered as the exclusive proporty of such
3.
Inglish manufacturers are fully cognisant of piṛnatice whereby liongkong, Merobante hae goods momafsotured in land to orier for purposes of wal● in Hongkong under trade ks of which such merchants have the sole right of war; and the cturera ho supplied gooda to the German firma must have Imre that the marks on such goods were Gormu marks, tha₺ josition of much marks in the market was due to Corian enter- be, and that the gods varo sold as tʊe goods of German firms, facturers ownnot therefore, I think, have any rights in
די
LAW, H.P..
rospect
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.